I join your leadership team 8–12 hours a week and own what a full-time CTO would: the roadmap, the hires, the architecture, and the HIPAA, FDA and SOC 2 questions that stop a deal or a round. It starts with a two-week readiness audit and a 90-day roadmap.
Formerly Director of Engineering, Verily (Google Life Sciences) · Genalyte · NASA JPL
If two or more of these are true, the audit will pay for itself in the first month.
And you have a company to run. Decisions wait, or get made by whoever is loudest.
The team is good. Nobody is setting direction, and a replacement search takes six months.
Three demos, no production path, and a board asking what the AI strategy is.
A customer, auditor or investor will ask, and the answer currently lives in someone's head.
A raise, an acquisition conversation or an enterprise contract that will look hard at your stack.
You want a number you trust, not a status update.
Two weeks, mostly my time, about four hours of yours. No slide theater. You get a scored assessment, the three risks that matter, and a roadmap with owners and dates.
Let's talkStack, infrastructure, release process, the velocity number you can defend.
HIPAA, FDA software (62304, Part 11 where it applies), SOC 2. Gaps ranked by the question that will expose them first.
Who you have, who you are missing, what to hire first and what to contract.
Which pilots deserve a production path, what data and governance they need, and what to stop.
Where you are paying twice, and where a vendor is a single point of failure.
You describe what is slowing you down. I tell you honestly whether the audit is the right next step, or whether you need a VP of Engineering, a vendor or nothing at all.
Interviews, code and infrastructure review, compliance walk-through. Delivered as a scored report, a 90-day roadmap and a board-ready one-pager.
Most clients choose a monthly advisory seat or an 8–12 hour-a-week fractional CTO retainer to run the roadmap. The audit fee is credited. Two retainer clients at a time, never more.
Most recently Director of Engineering at Verily, Google's life-sciences company under Alphabet, where I led a 30+ person organization across four product lines. I built the AI agent prototype that broke a six-month product stalemate and became the foundation of a company-wide AI program, raised engineering velocity 44.7% in one half, and delivered 100% of commitments on time through a reduction in force.
Before that I led engineering at Genalyte, building FDA-regulated diagnostic lab systems where software, hardware and compliance had to ship together. I started my career at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. I hold a patent (US 2014/0074744), co-authored two NASA JPL papers on the Terrestrial Planet Finder mission, Progress in Broadband Infrared Nulling Technology for TPF and Mid-IR Interferometric Nulling for TPF, and hold degrees in Computer Science.
Based in Orange County, California. Remote or on site in Southern California.
“John built the AI agent prototype that broke a six-month stalemate and seeded our company AI program, lifted velocity nearly 45% in one half, and delivered commitments on time through a reduction in force. He translates technology into risk and revenue clearly. He would be a highly capable, energetic and visionary CTO for any founder-led health company.”
Takes a minute. I read every one myself and reply within one business day with either a 20-minute slot or an honest "this isn't the right fit."
A fixed fee, stated on the intro call before you commit, and credited against the first month if we continue. [PRICE if you choose to publish it.]
About four hours of yours and six to eight across engineering, spread over two weeks.
Yes to an NDA before we start. A BAA if the audit touches systems holding PHI; usually it doesn't need to.
Sometimes that's the right answer and I'll say so. More often the roadmap tells you exactly who to hire, and I help you hire them.